# Temporal framework performance evaluation

**URL:** <https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-framework-performance-evaluation/4486>\
**Category:** Community Support\
**Tags:** performance\
**Created:** [April 20, 2022, 3:35pm UTC](https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-framework-performance-evaluation/4486 "2022-04-20T15:35:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tihomir](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.temporal.io/tihomir/32/6580_2.png) [@tihomir](https://community.temporal.io/u/tihomir)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2022, 4:23pm UTC](https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-framework-performance-evaluation/4486/2 "2022-04-20T16:23:00Z")

</div>

Hi @minhmv

For the first question, Temporal provides the [Maru load simulator](https://github.com/temporalio/maru) which is specific to workflows written using the Go SDK.  
As for scalability, there are production use cases which have hundreds of millions open workflows at any time.

There are also some load/performance-testing threads that might help [here](https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-and-cadence-performance-comparison/4393) and [here](https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-throughput/2263).

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.temporal.io/t/temporal-framework-performance-evaluation/4486)._