Is it more efficient with temporal to schedule a new cron workflow after a delay, or to keep an existing workflow running and use activity retries, if the delay is moderate (10m), and thousands of workflows are running?
maxim
2
Activity retry is much more efficient.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are Temporal Activities better than a while loop which retries | 1 | 2527 | February 5, 2022 | |
| What is the best way to implement long time retry for downstream service unavailble, increasing activity timeout or cronjob workflow? | 1 | 687 | September 1, 2022 | |
| Temporal Queue Activities | 11 | 3195 | October 14, 2021 | |
| Workflow Retry - Workflow should skip Activities which are successful in previous run | 8 | 1545 | October 18, 2024 | |
| What to do when an activity cannot proceed without re-running previously completed activities? | 4 | 242 | December 20, 2024 |